Ubiquitous wrote:
> noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>>Ubiquitous wrote:
>>
>>>noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>
>>>>Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>capt_malachias@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Ubiquitous" <weberm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>capt_malachias@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Ubiquitous" <weberm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>HWayne@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I never quite understood this. Who in their right minds
would get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>their views on life from a *movie*?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ask those who watched "Fahrenheit 9-11"...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Or "Red Dawn."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Umm, yeah, Try again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>So you agree then? Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Umm, do try and catch up with the rest of us on the right-hand
side of
>>>>>>>>>the bell-curve, mmkay?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You mean the right hand side of the wingnut basket, right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No, just those who think "Red Dawn" is an intelligent retort to my
>>>>>>>brilliant observation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Actually, that mention was pretty damned funny. Obviously, you are
>>>>>>forgetting the rampant Reagan-era panicmongering over the Soviets.
>>>>>
>>>>>Is that what you're calling it now?
>>>>
>>>>Why not? That's what it was.
>>>
>>>Correction: That's what you _think_ it was.
>>
>>Oh, yeah, right, I forgot about all those Soviet invasions of the U.S.
>>during the '80s. My bad.
>
>
> That's nice, but it has nothing to do with my statement.
Sure it does. Are you saying "Red Dawn" wasn't an example of Reagan-era
panic mongering?
>Do get back to us
> when you get a clue about The Cold War.
>
Speaking of clues, did you ever find anything pointing to an actual LIE
in "Fahrenheit 9/11"?
|
