"Joseph" <nonexistent@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Xns9844185439F5B619void@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Mazes and Monsters
> From: Some Guy <noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Yes, also when he posts something stupid he'll every bullying trick he
>> knows to distract people in those situations.
>>
>>You mean like this:
> Message ID: hYednWj-Gv9bs2_fRVn-pg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> My mistake. Apologies.
>
> --
> ^v^v^Malachias Invictus^v^v^
>
>> Wow, that's some pretty harsh bullying there.
> First of all this post is so long Xnews won't even allow a proper reply
> by normal means. :D
Perhaps you should learn to trim irrelevant quoted material in your
replies.
> And Google turns up nothing for that ID,
You are a ****y liar, Joseph. It turns up this:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.frp.dnd/msg/70916e3d41d1ff6c
> so I can't really comment
Whatever.
>>Again, I don't see any indication that he's somehow noticibly different
>>than the other regulars here in their reaction to harsh criticim (as
>>differentiated from non-harsh criticism).
> I don't agree with that at all. Mal is God-King of Abuse;
Dramatic, much?
> he looks for fights after all.
What is your point?
>>The point of course is not whether or not it *worked,* but whether or
>>not it was a reprehensible thing to do. It most certainly was, and
>>outside of his sockpuppets I don't remember anyone sup****ting Burke's
>>doing that. Do you?
>
> No, but I thought it deserved only a short rebuke,
Your opinion does not even remotely resemble the norm.
> instead of the way over the top responses. Such as the calls for
> Burkeicide (a term Bradd used in condemning calls for his self-inflicted
> death). Mal salivated with glee over the neologism
That is because it was a funny neologism. "Wearing the juice" is another
good one.
> And the "war" really fouled up the newsgroup for everyone else.
....everyone else who doesn't know how to use a newsreader, that is.
There
were plenty of topical posts to read. There always have been.
>>Explain how that's wrong. I don't respond to him any more, but he
>>keeps responding to me. That's an obsession HE has with ME.
> You are just another name in a long list of conquests in his eyes.
You are just another name in a long list of dupes who believe the hype.
I
> don't really care about him one way or the other, much. Better to regard
> him as a colorful piece of scenery and move on. I have told him in the
> past that he posts a lot of drivel.
>
>>>>It's pathetic, and you are not going to change Terry.
>>>
>>>I don't intend to.
>>
>>
>> You do intend to remain Terry's plaything, though.
>
>>Stealing material from Terry again? THAT's pathetic.
>
> It's quite accurate.
>
>>>>Yes, Mal has far more on-topic posts than Terry, but Mal also has
>>>>more off topic posts than Terry in recent years because Terry has
>>>>reduced his posting from years ago and Mal is prolific as ever.
>>>
>>>Which is a stupid argument. It's percentage, not quantity, and even
>>>if Mal were 50/50 (which I don't grant), Terry is about 1/1000. Who's
>>>worse in that case?
>>
>>
>> Pee-Wee Herman quotes don't offend me for one thing.
>
>>How does that affect signal to noise ratios, which was allegedly your
>>concern?
>
> Wasn't my only concern, not even my first concern when we get into
> really bad abuse. That kind of stuff drives people away from the
> newsgroups (so does the off-topic stuff, but I believe it is worse with
> this).
>
>>>>And what does Terry
>>>>and Mal have to do with what I said about MSB and Mal.
>>>
>>>You're the one using loaded language. I do what I have to to refute
>>>it, and pointing to a poster more deserving of your description is a
>>>natural part of that. There simply isn't anyone else posting here
>>>currently who fits your description of Mal's alleged bad habits than
>>>Terry. Did you want me to choose a character from fiction or
>>>something?
>>
>>
>>> Go check Mal's posts in RGFD this year. Mal has really been picking up
>>> the slack with MSB gone in being a bully and a slob.
....
> Message ID:
<snip list>
Is your issue that I had the gall to post an off-topic response to an
off-topic thread? If not, what the **** are you *****ing about?
>>Taking this as a sample, where is the bullying or slovenliness?
>>There's nothing worse than than him questioning Aaron's presumptions,
>>and no insults at all.
>
> I don't believe Aaron has ever been on his "****wit" list.
Nope.
> That makes a big difference.
Yes, whether or not the other poster is a ****wit makes a *huge*
difference.
> It's also funny you pick a thread where Mal is trying to
> pick a fight with Terry.
You got it exactly backwards, clueless. You even admit it below, which
makes you less clueless and more of a s***bag.
> And you can almost see the smoke coming out of Mal's ears since Terry
> pushed his hot button of selling D&D miniatures.
So I was picking the fight?
> As a side note, did you see Mal's recent reply to me when he went on an
> economic
> kookrant worthy of Shawn Wilson?
Prove it.
> Stating he tried to convince people how easy it was to make money,
It *is* easy to make money.
> but all the stupid people won't take the easy way
That is very true. The only hard part is changing your financial mindset.
Period.
> (like selling D&D miniatures)
Selling D&D miniatures is much easier than what most people do to make
money, but it is not nearly as easy as other ways, and does not make as
much.
> and instead do hard labor.
Yes, people do exactly that. I even have friends that do. They are
convinced that hard work is the way to go, in spite of direct evidence
that
it isn't.
> Nice economy you got there, Mal.
I know.
> I have yet to see his book at Barnes and Noble!
That is Sea Wasp's department, not mine. You will probably see my name on
some low budget horror flicks though.
--
^v^v^Malachias Invictus^v^v^
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishment the scroll,
I am the Master of my fate:
I am the Captain of my soul.
from _Invictus_, by William Ernest Henley
|
