"Joseph" <nonexistent@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Xns984421C49500D619void@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Malachias Invictus" <invictusebay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>> No dodging at all. Your non sequitur is nothing more than an attempt
>> at obfuscating the issue.
>
> So you all really just buddies and you are just taking the piss out of
> each
> other?
Nope.
> Mayhap you go through cycles of hostility and acceptance like an old
> married couple?
Nope.
> The world should know the scoop.
Terry sometimes has insightful things to say. When responding to such
things, I don't tend to let previous or even concurrent ****wittery shade
my
reply. That is why you will see me talking a ton of **** to someone in
one
thread, while simultaneously having a civil discussion with them in
another.
I have even done so within the same post.
>>>>> Terry certainly hasn't changed. He hurt your little feelings too
>>>>> much, did he?
>>>>
>>>> Nope. By the way, how does this, even if it were true, show that I
>>>> don't have an honest bone in my body when challenged?
>>>
>>> Answer it yourself, if you can.
>>
>> No. It is your assertion. Either show its relevance, or shut the
>> **** up.
>
> You have been snipping out of context Terry's posts against you a lot
> lately.
Terry's recent posts have been largely bereft of actual content. What
relevant points are you claiming I failed to address?
> You did the same to me recently.
Not really.
> Message ID: <Xns9815CB0C7DFFD619void@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Message ID: <VI2dnR6uC4oraU7ZnZ2dnUVZ_r-dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> See the sleazy snipping you did to make me look bad and yourself better.
> Don't try to deny it.
What I see is a bunch of dodging on your part, and a failure to back up
your
silly opinions. If you have an actual concrete example of me doing so
with
an actual relevant point, then quote it.
>>> since morality has no existence how can I be crippled
>>> by something that is imaginary. The crippling comes from believing in
>>> morality, instead of being liberated from realizing it is a facade
>>> invented by humans.
>> Spare me your Philosophy 101 babble, kook.
> I notice you give no position of your own on the issue
No, I didn't. I am not about to be drawn into a lengthy circle-jerk
discussion about theoretical philosophy.
> but a toss-away insult. Typical Mal.
Yep. A toss-away insult is all that crap rated.
>> I don't run around obsessively reading everything Kaos writes.
>
> And yet you bother to suggest possibilities of what she meant. Are you
> just
> trying to make me look bad by dissembling?
I will spoon-feed you this one. Kaos is a Discordian.
>>> Objection Your Honor witness is being augmentative.
>> Attempting to ignorantly use legal language with me is making you look
>> like even more of a fool that you already do. For a stalker, you
>> certainly don't do your homework.
> What am I supposed to do wipe my memory bank of your personal details
when
> you post them on Usenet, lawyer?
No. You are supposed to do your homework before using legal language in a
discussion with someone who actually knows what the words mean. By the
way,
I do not practice law (too much work, not enough money), so I am
technically
not a lawyer.
> Here's the deal: When someone is a smiter of stupidity I expect a
minimal
> level of evenhandedness in the practice.
I can agree with that position.
> If someone consistently ignores stupid behavior in a poster you
> usually get along with (use whatever term you wish) while attacking
> others' stupidity in the same time frame --
Realize that there is a difference in replying to a normally intelligent
poster who is being a ****wit, and replying to a normally ****witted
poster
who is being a ****wit. I tended to reply differently in these cases.
Michael tended to reply similarly.
>> As I recall, I largely dropped out of that thread fairly early on, and
>> did not read too much of the subthreads that had become an MSB/Bradd
>> pissing contest. I spent most of my time in that thread arguing
>> against a position that Matt Frisch took.
>
> That's... convenient.
You may notice that, historically, I respond less to alignment thread
arguments, because they get repetitive and boring.
> Especially since you posted in quite a few other
> threads in 2005 where MSB was being called out for bad behavior by more
> than just me and Bradd.
Feel free to list the threads.
>>>> We have similar posting styles,
>>>> and some similar interests and attitudes otherwise.
>>>
>>> Why don't you live with him, then?
>>
>> My house is bigger than his.
>
> So you do have personal information about his property. Interesting.
Why? Terry actually met him.
>>> You live in the same state after all,
>>> and you seem to know he still around... somehow.
>> He popped into this NG a month or two ago. He is likely stuck working
>> for someone who doesn't allow Usenet access, or is otherwise too busy
>> to be here.
> I think he has enough money to get access if he wished outside of work.
He is likely doing other things when not working, then. I can pretty much
post whenever I feel like it, and have lots of free time; not everyone has
that luxury.
--
^v^v^Malachias Invictus^v^v^
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishment the scroll,
I am the Master of my fate:
I am the Captain of my soul.
from _Invictus_, by William Ernest Henley
|
