on Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:19:04 GMT, Joseph wrote:
> "Malachias Invictus" <invictusebay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:RuydnVkRsvctSI3YnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >
> > "Joseph" <nonexistent@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:Xns9843BE1DB670619void@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> "Malachias Invictus" <invictusebay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>> "Joseph" <nonexistent@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>> "Malachias Invictus" <invictusebay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>> "Joseph" <nonexistent@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>>>> news:Xns98437E63290E619void@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>> Some Guy <noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >>>>>>> Joseph wrote:
> >
> >>>>>>>> Let's get real here -- Mal doesn't have an honest bone in his
> >>>>>>>> body when challenged.
> >
> >>>>>>> Are you saying he won't admit when he's wrong? I think Google
> >>>>>>> would disagree with you in that regard. Shall we have a look
> >>>>>>> through the archives?
> >
> >>>>>> I am saying that he has a strong tendency for that when he has a
> >>>>>> negative attitude towards a poster or position,
> >
> >>>>> Wow. Nice weasel, Joseph. Either back up your opinion with fact
> >>>>> or shut the **** up.
> >
> >>>> 1. You were cordial with Terry Austin once upon a time.
> >>>
> >>> I have been cordial with Terry Austin recently, too.
> >>
> >> It's the exception that proves the rule.
> >
> > It's the cliche that proves you are full of ****.
>
> >> Nice dodge.
> >
> > No dodging at all. Your non sequitur is nothing more than an attempt
> > at obfuscating the issue.
>
> So you all really just buddies and you are just taking the piss out of
each
> other? Mayhap you go through cycles of hostility and acceptance like an
old
> married couple? The world should know the scoop.
More likely, he's not silly enough to let a disagreement over one
subject colour his responses on other matters (barring cases of
patterned behaviour,) no matter how vehement or cordial he may be in
either situation.
> >>> We have similar posting styles,
> >>> and some similar interests and attitudes otherwise.
> >>
> >> Why don't you live with him, then?
> >
> > My house is bigger than his.
>
> So you do have personal information about his property. Interesting.
Are you trying to play some kind of gay card here? Of what relevance is
it if there is or is not some homo*****c interest between the two of
them?
|
