on Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:41:15 GMT, Joseph wrote:
> "Malachias Invictus" <invictusebay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:M6CdncWkN-e9-Y3YnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<snip>
> > Not really.
>
> Yes it is, IDIOT, since morality has no existence how can I be crippled
> by something that is imaginary. The crippling comes from believing in
> morality, instead of being liberated from realizing it is a facade
> invented by humans.
That's an incredibly silly statement. Ideas have existence, even if it
be an intangible one.
They also have their uses, purposes and values. Recognition of this is
precisely why the chaote creed is not a form of amorality, but simply a
rejection of absolutism.
(Of course, the typical chaote can also accept absolutism when it is
useful to do so.)
> > Oh, I *do* play favorites. I am partial to those who are not idiots.
>
> Most idiots think that.
But then, so do most non-idiots. Unless they're the kind who feel
sympathy and compassion towards idiots.
> > By the way, how does this, even if it were true, show that I don't
> > have an honest bone in my body when challenged?
>
> My jurors the accused does not understand the value of character
> evidence of integrity when talking about the accused lying, integrity
> and so forth.
Those are some interesting moral judgements you're making there. Are
you sure you're truly liberated?
|
