Kaos <gafgirl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:Ue4Rg.32850$cz3.23886@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> on Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:19:04 GMT, Joseph wrote:
>
>> "Malachias Invictus" <invictusebay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>> news:RuydnVkRsvctSI3YnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> >
>> > "Joseph" <nonexistent@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> > news:Xns9843BE1DB670619void@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> "Malachias Invictus" <invictusebay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>> "Joseph" <nonexistent@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>>> "Malachias Invictus" <invictusebay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>>>> "Joseph" <nonexistent@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >>>>> news:Xns98437E63290E619void@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>>>>> Some Guy <noemailformethanks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>> >>>>>>> Joseph wrote:
>> >
>> >>>>>>>> Let's get real here -- Mal doesn't have an honest bone in
>> >>>>>>>> his body when challenged.
>> >
>> >>>>>>> Are you saying he won't admit when he's wrong? I think
>> >>>>>>> Google would disagree with you in that regard. Shall we have
>> >>>>>>> a look through the archives?
>> >
>> >>>>>> I am saying that he has a strong tendency for that when he has
>> >>>>>> a negative attitude towards a poster or position,
>> >
>> >>>>> Wow. Nice weasel, Joseph. Either back up your opinion with
>> >>>>> fact or shut the **** up.
>> >
>> >>>> 1. You were cordial with Terry Austin once upon a time.
>> >>>
>> >>> I have been cordial with Terry Austin recently, too.
>> >>
>> >> It's the exception that proves the rule.
>> >
>> > It's the cliche that proves you are full of ****.
>>
>> >> Nice dodge.
>> >
>> > No dodging at all. Your non sequitur is nothing more than an
>> > attempt at obfuscating the issue.
>>
>> So you all really just buddies and you are just taking the piss out
>> of each other? Mayhap you go through cycles of hostility and
>> acceptance like an old married couple? The world should know the
>> scoop.
>
> More likely, he's not silly enough to let a disagreement over one
> subject colour his responses on other matters (barring cases of
> patterned behaviour,) no matter how vehement or cordial he may be in
> either situation.
And that is something I've attempted to do even in the midst of my worst
flamewars, and sometimes have failed. (Note to self: decrease
participation in flaming.) I've just noticed that the quarrelsome
bickering between Mal and Terry has reached a level of nastiness (and
greater level of trolling between them) that I have not seen in their
conservations until the past few months.
>> >>> We have similar posting styles,
>> >>> and some similar interests and attitudes otherwise.
>> >>
>> >> Why don't you live with him, then?
>> >
>> > My house is bigger than his.
>>
>> So you do have personal information about his property. Interesting.
>
> Are you trying to play some kind of gay card here?
Absolutely not. Although I was raised in a religion that was stridently
anti-gay; I've long since discarded that nasty "moral value" I'm
delighted to say.
>Of what relevance
>is it if there is or is not some homo*****c interest between the two
>of them?
This is me playing the lame conspiracy card of them hatching plots
together in some mansion like a cabal of mad social scientists.
|
