Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > HDTV Tech > Re: ANALOG RECE...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 4 Topic 10436 of 11863
Post > Topic >>

Re: ANALOG RECEPTION IS SUPERIOR to digital non-reception

by Wes Newell <w.newell@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 9, 2008 at 03:20 PM

On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 09:13:51 -0500, Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:

> In article <7Xarj.943$qw4.485@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  Wes Newell <w.newell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> > Let's go back to the idea that "I can still watch a snowy analog
>> > picture, but I can't watch a blank screen".  When there's not enough
>> > digital information for the dumb computer inside the TV to decode
>> > anything into a picture, yet there is enough information in the
>> > analog picture for the human brain to decode a picture/sound and see
>> > the story, how is it that digital is better?
>> 
>> Because with digital, you won't be subjected to such trash.
> 
> Are you paying any attention?  Did you actually READ?
> 
You should ask yourself the same thing. Did YOU read what you edited out 
of most post?

> With digital, you are subjected to the on/off, the dumb computer in the
> television either has enough info or doesn't have enough info, period
> syndrome.

The only thing that would be black with digital are analog stations with 
signals so weak, they wouldn't be worth watching anyway. Been there, done 
that. And the fact is that even the very stongest analog station won't 
look as good as a poor digital station. Why else would you think I would 
switch to digital before I had to. Because analog NTSC sucks.

> But the human brain is far beyond that, and can easily pick out the
> story in a snowy analog picture.
> 
If the analog station is watchable, then you can get the digital station 
crystal clear, and in HD if the station sup****ts it.

> Digital TVs don't change that one bit.

Actually, they do. The acceptable signal strength is controlled by the 
TV. I can adjust it with my PC based system. But not on the TV. This may 
differ with some TV's, but I doubt it. Most even do the same for analog 
now, but the standards are much lower. My analog scan picked up NTSC 
stations I would call unwatchable. They also drop to a black screen (or 
blue) BTW with a weak signal, so there's really no difference. And even 
if they remain on screen, they are not watchable. I know, I've got 3 
analog stations like that here, Fox 4, NBC 5, and Ind. 2. And sometimes 
they don't even scan in with the TV. There digital counter parts are 
crystal clear and in HD. So you keep your analog TV while I enjoy crystal 
clear pictures in HD.

-- 
Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org
My Tivo Experience http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/tivo.htm
Tivo HD/S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm
AMD cpu help http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
Re: ANALOG RECEPTION IS SUPERIOR to digital non-reception
Wes Newell <w.newell@[  2008-02-09 15:20:22 
Re: ANALOG RECEPTION IS SUPERIOR to digital non-reception
"Charles Tomaras&quo  2008-02-09 07:27:40 
Private Message
   2008-02-09 12:06:57 
Private Message
   2008-02-09 10:31:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 9:09:02 CST 2008.