Re: DishNet ViP722

On Sat, 3 May 2008 10:25:40 -0500 Deke <no spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
| 
| <phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
| news:fvgrcn31nb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> On Fri, 2 May 2008 19:53:21 -0500 Deke <no spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
|>
|> | (shrug)  I use multiple external hard drives.  That way if one of
them
| bites
|> | the dust, only what was stored on that HD is lost.  Plus theres the
| transfer
|> | speed to consider.  It takes awhile to transfer a movie from the
| internal HD
|> | to another.
|> | You can go on and on about coulda-shoulda-woulda, but the fact
remains,
| the
|> | DN 722 is hands down the best on the market.
|> | You could just get a bunch of computer stuff, and build your own.
|>
|> Build my own receiver with computer stuff?  How would that be made to
work
|> with DN legally?
|>
|> -- 
| Note header line.  Build your own DVR.  You seem to know alot about
computer
| stuff, figure it out.

Building the recorder is fine.  The issue is being able to receive the
signal
and to do so in a legal way.

-- 
|WARNING: Due to extreme spam, I no longer see any articles originating
from  |
|         Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by more
readers |
|         you will need to find a different place to post on Usenet.      
   |
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (email for humans: first name in lower case at
ipal.net) |