Re: Blu-ray Numbers Too Low To Release

On Sat, 3 May 2008 18:20:38 +0100, Sean <snm_ukTROUSERS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>In article <GH%Sj.121146$4f4.4350@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, 
>Nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>> I know what he's meaning to say.  My point is that he's not saying what
he 
>> means.  HD TV is current technology. If anything non-HD TVs are not
current 
>> technology, they're old technology.
>
>No you're wrong. I am not aware of any broadcasters that only broadcast 
>in HD. In the UK around 98% of all broadcasts are made in SD.
>
>> > You need to replace your TV
>> > and this was not the case with DVDs.
>> 
>> *Some* people would have to replace their TV.  The rest wouldn't, I
didn't. 
>> My parents wouldn't, most of my friends wouldn't.   If you've bought a
good 
>> TV in the past couple of years it's already going to be HD ready. As
time 
>> move on there are going to be less people who have non-HD TVs, just as
fewer 
>> people have CRT TVs. 
>> 
>You're making statements without backing it up with data. The figures 
>for SD TV's owner****p against HD capable TV's are stil vastly skewed in 
>favour of SD. Oh and many HD TV's aren't even fully HD, most sold in the 
>last few years only do 720p as opposed to fully HD compliant 1080p.


  Look, dumb****.  BOTH are "fully HD compliant".  HD starts at 720p, so
stop spreading your stupid mis-information.

  However, IF one is going to make the wide form factor plunge, it would
be quite stupid to buy a display that is not at the current high
resolution array size of 1080p or i.

  Come back when you actually know what you are talking about.

  Goddamned crossposting ****ing retards!