Re: Surge / Ground / Lightning

"w_tom" <w_tom1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:131decf4-6a8d-42e8-a973-b71a30a7f862@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 1, 12:21 pm, trad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>  He says appliance/ electronics manufacturers put surge
>> protection inside the appliance and that is peachy keen
>> and appropriate.     Yet he can't explain how it is that an
>> MOV inside the electronics actually protects, while an
>> MOV located in a plug-in is useless.
>
>  If trader read what was posted rather than entertain his
> assumptions, then trader would understand appliances contain internal
> protection.  When trader misread, then trader reclessly invented MOVs
> to provide internal protection.  What w_tom posted is not found in
> trader's wild speculation.
>
>  With a grasp of technology, then trader would have known industry
> standard numbers that defined internal electronics protection even 35
> years ago.  Trader does not know these numbers.  Trader then assumed
> that protection must be provided by MOVs.  Trader - learn technology
> BEFORE knowing everything.  You have no idea of protection inside all
> appliances.  By reading reclessly and by using wild speculation and
> ignorance, trader assumes protection must be provided by MOVs.
>
>  Protection inside appliances is integrated within appliance
> design.   Internal appliance protection that may be overwhelmed if a
> 'whole house' protector is not installed and properly earthed.
> Nothing in that paragraph discusses MOVs.  MOVs inside appliances is
> another trader 'wild speculation' due to knowledge without first
> learning the technology.
>
>   We earth a 'whole house' protector AND connect all protectors short
> (ie 'less than 10 feet') to single point earth ground so that
> protection inside all appliances is not overwhelmed.  Simple stuff
> that so confused trader.  trader *assumed* MOVs rather than read what
> was posted.   trader again demonstrates insufficient technical
> kowledge justifies his mockery and insult.   Mythical MOV inside
> appliances demonstrate that trader only reads what he wants to see;
> not what is posted.
>
>  MOVs inside appliances is another trader myth.  Had trader read what
> was posted or learned technology, then trader would not invent
> fictional MOVs inside appliances.


Why do you have this pompous attitude; constantly sermonizing down to
people 
as if they're your little, personal kindergarten class?

You read sometimes like one of those old children's "Golden Books".