Re: Surge / Ground / Lightning

phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> In alt.engineering.electrical bud-- <remove.budnews@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> | phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> |> In alt.engineering.electrical bud-- <remove.budnews@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> |> | phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> |> |> In alt.tv.tech.hdtv bud-- <remove.budnews@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> |> 
> |> |> | w_' professional engineer source says 8 micoseconds with most of
the 
> |> |> | spectrum under 100kHz.
> |> |> 
> |> |> Even with 1 nanosecond rise time, most of the energy will be
present in
> |> |> the spectrum below 100 kHz.  That means nothing when the surge is
strong
> |> |> enough to have energy above some frequency that is relevant to the
whole
> |> |> system involved that can do damage.  That frequency might be 100
Mhz for
> |> |> some thing, and 1 GHz for other things.
> |> | 
> |> | Still missing - your source. Nanosecond risetime. 100MHz spectrum.
> |> 
> |> Observation.  Of course this is a concept you cannot understand.
> | 
> | Observation proves flying saucers and magic.
> | 
> | Without sup****ting sources it is Phil's Phantasy Physics.
> | Where is a source that sup****ts your belief in nanosecond risetimes
and 
> | 100MHz spectrum?
> 
> There is no point in spending the effort to find some quotable source
because
> you wouldn't know what to do with it.

In other words - it is Phil’s Phantasy Physics, so no sup****ting link 
exists.

-- 
bud--