Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > HDTV Tech > Re: Is Oppo the...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 11 of 48 Topic 11083 of 11375
Post > Topic >>

Re: Is Oppo the way to go?

by Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 7, 2008 at 06:05 PM

phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On Wed, 07 May 2008 15:04:06 -0500 Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>=20
> | The Sony line of LCD panels call it "Cinema mode" for their native 24=
fps=20
> | playback feature, and those that don't still have a 3:2 pulldown feat=
ure.
>=20
> I understood Cinema mode to be a feature that corrected 3:2 pulldown so=

> that each frame was shown 5 times at 120 Hz.

Again, not all Sony LCD displays have 120Hz frame rates, but for those=20
that do, yes (now that I'm reading this again), the 120Hz Motionflow=20
eliminates the need for 3:2 pulldown.  For those displays without=20
Motionflow, 3:2 pulldown is still included.

 From Sony.com for Bravia XBR series LCD displays (and the marketing=20
hype is Sony's, not mine)

24p True Cinema (24p Input Capability)

Many movies are filmed at 24 frames per second (fps) and prime time TV=20
programs are recorded at 24p.  Seizing on an op****tunity, some studios=20
are taking a purist approach and encoding high definition video content=20
such as Blu-ray Disc in 24p.  Sony wisely takes advantage of this by=20
including 24p output capability on our Blu-ray Disc players as well as=20
including 24p input capability select 2007 BRAVIA TVs.  The benefit=20
images are smooth and natural looking.  Once you experience 24p video it =

will be hard to view video without it.


Motionflow=99 120 Hz with Full HD high frame rate capability

Taking motion performance to the next level requires innovation and=20
expertise.  Enter Sony's Motionflow=99 High Frame Rate technology.=20
Motionflow=99 detects the incoming video signal and applies the=20
appropriate processing for optimum motion reproduction.  Taking full=20
advantage of film sourced 24fps encoded content available on DVD and=20
Blu-ray Disc, Motionflow=99 eliminates the need for 3:2 pulldown and=20
delivers smooth, judder free video, faithfully preserving the integrity=20
of the original film.  When 60fps content is detected, Motionflow=99=20
doubles the amount of frames and uses real-time calculation to create a=20
new level of natural motion reproduction.  You'll experience movies and=20
s****ts with a greater sense of realism than ever before.


>=20
>=20
> |> | Further, it should also be noted that not all DVD players will out=
put=20
> |> | 24fps natively, but will use a feature to convert 24fps to 30fps, =
often=20
> |> | called "3:2 pulldown" for displays that only do 30fps - best imple=
mented=20
> |> | with a Faroudja engine (hint: Oppo), IMO, although there are other=
=20
> |> | technologies also using the '3:2 pulldown' moniker.
> |>=20
> |> Which, of course, sucks.  OTOH, some TVs re****t an ability to detect=
 and
> |> fix the 3:2 pulldown.  They'd have to display at some multiple of 24=
fps to
> |> achieve that.  Some do work at 120fps which could.
> |=20
> | The 3:2 pulldown has something to do with strategically inserting a=20
> | composite frame to achieve 30fps from 24fps source, and yes, some do =

> | this better than others.  Since I have an extensive DVD library here =

> | which is used almost daily, I decided it best to have 24fps native=20
> | somewhere in the food chain.
>=20
> It's actually doing it on a field by field basis, for interlaced output=
=2E
> If the source is progressive and they are outputting p24 as p30, then
> there is an inserted frame ever 4 frames to make 5 frames.  That would
> actually look worse.

I have both an old 480i and 480p DVD players.  I've tried both with the=20
same source material and they both look virtually identical.  I believe=20
the Sony display auto-senses the i or p material (depending on which=20
player), and automagically does the 'right' thing for each, I can't see=20
a difference all else being the same.


>=20
> The big question is, what is actually going over the wire between DVD
> player and TV when p24 content is playing.  If there is composite outpu=
t
> then you might be able to check on that with an oscilloscope.

I use HDMI for everything that accepts it, and component where it's not.


>=20
>=20
> | I did unscientifically test SD DVD's while locking the BD player and =
TV=20
> | into 30fps mode, and the Faroudja engine in the AVR did well enough I=
=20
> | honestly couldn't tell much difference.  In the end though, I allow t=
he=20
> | BD player output disc native (24/30fps), pass-through the AVR with th=
e=20
> | Faroudja engine hobbled, and let the TV do what it does best, and=20
> | everybody is happy.
>=20
> Can you lock it into 24fps mode?
>=20


I don't think I can based on how I understand the menus - 24/30fps auto=20
or 30fps only.


--=20
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'
 




 48 Posts in Topic:
Is Oppo the way to go?
oscarmayer@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-06 23:20:07 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
"Fishface" <  2008-05-07 00:54:31 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-07 04:39:31 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
"L Alpert" <  2008-05-07 06:22:40 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
Chet Bosco <chet@[EMAI  2008-05-07 06:54:33 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
Tim <jmeth111@[EMAIL P  2008-05-07 08:20:30 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-07 08:09:39 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-07 16:53:03 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-07 15:04:06 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-07 21:58:39 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-07 18:05:16 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 02:15:32 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 00:04:28 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 19:07:38 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-07 17:30:30 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-07 07:35:46 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-07 16:55:44 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-07 15:14:43 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-07 22:03:11 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-07 18:11:50 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 02:25:40 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 00:14:43 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 19:11:12 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
"Tantalust" <  2008-05-07 18:49:42 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 02:34:30 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
"Tantalust" <  2008-05-08 07:44:11 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 19:12:54 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
"Tantalust" <  2008-05-08 16:06:27 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 05:59:36 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
"Tantalust" <  2008-05-09 07:43:14 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
"Fishface" <  2008-05-07 13:16:19 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-07 17:26:55 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
sniffster <sniffster@[  2008-05-07 08:21:50 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
Chet Bosco <chet@[EMAI  2008-05-06 21:04:34 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
skip <skip[@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-07 03:09:21 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
Tim <jmeth111@[EMAIL P  2008-05-07 08:17:12 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
willbill <trek@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 22:01:12 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
willbill <trek@[EMAIL   2008-05-08 09:33:24 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 19:13:46 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
willbill <trek@[EMAIL   2008-05-08 15:37:44 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 06:13:14 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
Sam <sammy@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 16:07:28 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
Chet Bosco <chet@[EMAI  2008-05-08 11:18:01 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
willbill <trek@[EMAIL   2008-05-08 11:44:21 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
Chet Bosco <chet@[EMAI  2008-05-08 12:44:29 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
willbill <trek@[EMAIL   2008-05-08 15:31:07 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 19:16:44 
Re: Is Oppo the way to go?
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 19:14:59 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 19:55:26 CDT 2008.