Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > HDTV Tech > Re: Analog Cabl...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 41 Topic 11102 of 11375
Post > Topic >>

Re: Analog Cable Going

by Alan F <afiggatt1@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 8, 2008 at 11:28 PM

Guy wrote:
> There's no reason in the world that the cable companies must send a
digital 
> broadcast over the cable as a digital signal. Just as a converter box 
> converts a digital signal to analog and then sends it to your set over
the 
> coax connector, so too can a cable system do the conversion at their 
> headquarters and send it as an analog signal from there to your house.

  There are very good reasons to go all digital - bandwidth! Each analog
NTSC channel takes up 6 MHz of bandwidth. In that same frequency space,
they can insert a digital QAM-256 signal with a 38,4 Mbps data rate
which can carry 9 to 10 high quality digital SD channels or 2 full
bandwidth HD channels (or 3 over-compressed HD channels as Comcast has
started to do).

  Analog NTSC is a major bandwidth hog. The bandwidth crunch is between
your house and the head end. With 135 channels available in a typical
860 MHz system, a typical cable line-up of 70+ analog channels takes up
a huge chunk of the available bandwidth. By turning off 10 analog
channels and replacing them with digital QAM channels, the cable company
can add 90 SD 480i channels of better picture quality or 20 HD channels
with 5.1 sound. Analog NTSC has served us well, but its' time has passed.

  Alan F
 




 41 Posts in Topic:
Analog Cable Going
"Tam" <t-tam  2008-05-08 12:55:00 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Chet Bosco <chet@[EMAI  2008-05-08 12:46:09 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 19:25:16 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Philip <none@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-08 15:41:01 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 06:22:24 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Thumper <jaylsmith@[EM  2008-05-09 13:54:34 
Re: Analog Cable Going
"Guy" <nospa  2008-05-08 18:54:56 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Alan F <afiggatt1@[EMA  2008-05-08 23:28:24 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 23:13:16 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Kimba W Lion <kimbawli  2008-05-08 21:15:36 
Re: Analog Cable Going
SAC441@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 14:10:35 
Re: Analog Cable Going
"Bill's News" &  2008-05-11 18:17:04 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-12 03:36:55 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:24:52 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-12 10:10:51 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 09:11:14 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-12 20:31:17 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 16:05:08 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Mike O. <mike@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 00:08:46 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 09:31:48 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 06:26:25 
Private Message
   2008-05-09 06:21:23 
Private Message
   2008-05-09 08:23:10 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Thumper <jaylsmith@[EM  2008-05-09 13:59:07 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Thumper <jaylsmith@[EM  2008-05-09 13:55:32 
Re: Analog Cable Going
mzenier@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 02:18:56 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Heinrich Galland <hein  2008-05-11 12:24:46 
Re: Analog Cable Going
"Charles Tomaras&quo  2008-05-11 11:01:20 
Private Message
   2008-05-11 15:50:19 
Private Message
   2008-05-11 15:33:15 
Private Message
   2008-05-12 03:39:14 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Philip <none@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-11 11:25:33 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-12 03:39:54 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-09 00:07:10 
Re: Analog Cable Going
"Tam" <t-tam  2008-05-08 14:24:23 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 06:20:50 
Re: Analog Cable Going
RobertVA <robert_c72at  2008-05-09 11:53:25 
Re: Analog Cable Going
G-squared <stratus46@[  2008-05-08 18:36:23 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Mad Mac <FTSpammers@[E  2008-05-08 20:27:34 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 23:07:31 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Wes Newell <w.newell@[  2008-05-09 05:59:10 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 19:59:51 CDT 2008.