Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Television > HDTV Tech > Re: Analog Cabl...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 32 of 41 Topic 11102 of 11910
Post > Topic >>

Re: Analog Cable Going

by Philip <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 11, 2008 at 11:25 AM

Heinrich Galland wrote:
> In article <g073af$fr6$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Mark Zenier
> <mzenier@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> In article <482384c0$0$7066$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> Guy <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> ...
>>> There's no reason in the world that the cable companies must send a
digital
>>> broadcast over the cable as a digital signal. Just as a converter box
>>> converts a digital signal to analog and then sends it to your set over
the
>>> coax connector, so too can a cable system do the conversion at their
>>> headquarters and send it as an analog signal from there to your house.
That
>>> way there's no need for millions of set-top boxes. Given this
possibility,
>>> if you were the cable companies, which option would you choose:
millions of
>>> set-top boxes , or convert at HQ and send analog signal? The smart
choice
>>> would be the latter. Do a little investigation and I believe you will
find
>>> that they WILL be going that route.
>> Alternative 3:  The cable company just repeats the digital broadcast
from
>> the local over the air stations and makes the basic service level get 
>> their own box.  
>>
>> Low equipment requirements at the head end, no bad public relations
>> about missing sub-channels that their customer's neighbors get, no
>> worrying about reconfiguring their system to match what the stations
>> are doing that day/week/month.  And they don't have to finance the 
>> converter boxes.  
>>
>> They can weasel out and say that they're giving the same stuff that's
>> available OTA, just like they were doing when it was all analog.
>>
>> Mark Zenier  mzenier@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
>> Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)
> 
> 
> I found this:
> 
> 
> http://forum.ecoustics.com/bbs/messages/34579/396905.html
> 
> 
> Analog Cable Subscribers -- The latest FCC rule, adopted on September
> 11, 2007, will allow continued access to local stations for cable
> customers (including those with standard analog cable service)
> following the transition to digital TV in 2009. This rule applies only
> to local television stations, not cable networks or premium cable
> channels and the rule expires in 2012. At that time, you will need
> digital cable or another solution.
> 
> 
> -------
> 
> So it appears that Cable companies will be required to continue
> broadcasting analog at least for basic cable receipients for at least 3
> years after the stream is shut down by the actual TV stations.
> 

Great! In my area get two local stations: one independent and one 
shopping network.
 




 41 Posts in Topic:
Analog Cable Going
"Tam" <t-tam  2008-05-08 12:55:00 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Chet Bosco <chet@[EMAI  2008-05-08 12:46:09 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 19:25:16 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Philip <none@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-08 15:41:01 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 06:22:24 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Thumper <jaylsmith@[EM  2008-05-09 13:54:34 
Re: Analog Cable Going
"Guy" <nospa  2008-05-08 18:54:56 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Alan F <afiggatt1@[EMA  2008-05-08 23:28:24 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 23:13:16 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Kimba W Lion <kimbawli  2008-05-08 21:15:36 
Re: Analog Cable Going
SAC441@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 14:10:35 
Re: Analog Cable Going
"Bill's News" &  2008-05-11 18:17:04 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-12 03:36:55 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 00:24:52 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-12 10:10:51 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 09:11:14 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-12 20:31:17 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-12 16:05:08 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Mike O. <mike@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 00:08:46 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 09:31:48 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 06:26:25 
Private Message
   2008-05-09 06:21:23 
Private Message
   2008-05-09 08:23:10 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Thumper <jaylsmith@[EM  2008-05-09 13:59:07 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Thumper <jaylsmith@[EM  2008-05-09 13:55:32 
Re: Analog Cable Going
mzenier@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 02:18:56 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Heinrich Galland <hein  2008-05-11 12:24:46 
Re: Analog Cable Going
"Charles Tomaras&quo  2008-05-11 11:01:20 
Private Message
   2008-05-11 15:50:19 
Private Message
   2008-05-11 15:33:15 
Private Message
   2008-05-12 03:39:14 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Philip <none@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-11 11:25:33 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-12 03:39:54 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-09 00:07:10 
Re: Analog Cable Going
"Tam" <t-tam  2008-05-08 14:24:23 
Re: Analog Cable Going
phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 06:20:50 
Re: Analog Cable Going
RobertVA <robert_c72at  2008-05-09 11:53:25 
Re: Analog Cable Going
G-squared <stratus46@[  2008-05-08 18:36:23 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Mad Mac <FTSpammers@[E  2008-05-08 20:27:34 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Jer <gdunn@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 23:07:31 
Re: Analog Cable Going
Wes Newell <w.newell@[  2008-05-09 05:59:10 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 8:24:41 CST 2008.