Pidge wrote:
> On 24 Apr 2006 10:40:32 -0700, seerialmom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>>David wrote:
>>
>>>from mediaweek
>>>
>>>TLC Gives Little People 2nd Run
>>>by Anthony Crupi
>>>
>>>TLC has picked up a second season of its unscripted series Little
>>>People, Big World, ordering 14 half-hour episodes to run some time in
>>>the fourth quarter.
>>>
>>>A candid look at the lives of a family comprised of little people and
>>>their brood of normal- and undersized offspring, the series has
>>>averaged 1.3 million total viewers since debuting last month.
>>>
>>>Little People also gave TLC a much-needed lift in its core 18-49 demo,
>>>averaging a 0.7 household rating for that age group, an increase of 40
>>>percent over its performance in the Saturday 8:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m. time
>>>slot last year.
>>>
>>>TLC's prime time 18-49 audience dropped 25 percent in 2005, averaging
>>>402,000 compared to 535,000 the prior year.
>>
>>That's one of the shows I set the DVR for; it's interesting because of
>>the different challenges (average twin who has a dwarf twin...didn't
>>they make a movie like that?). I just hope it doesn't go Osbournes on
>>us...kids hamming it up for the camera.
>>
>>But I think TLC made a major mistake by either not giving Paige Davis a
>>big raise...and by completely changing the format of Tradiing Spaces;
>>that "was" the big show. Now it's just basic crap...haven't watched
>>for over a year.
Hmm... it's quite a dilemma choosing to either not have firing Davis and
keeping her on or doing that (which they did), letting Trading Spaces
slip away like a wayward cloud and put all their stock into Little
People, Big World. These people just aren't likable.
>
>
> Excellent!
> FWIW, I think the mother wouldn't tolerate hammy kids one bit. She'd
put them
> in their place.
>
> -------------
> To send email, replace "antispam" with "sympatico"
|
